PSMA ETHICS COMPLAINT PROCEDURES
The Pennsylvania Septage Management Association (PSMA), through the National Onsite Foundation (NOF), prides itself for establishing the PSMA/NOF Standards of Practice to evaluate Private Waste disposal systems. The Standards have been described as the “Industry Standard” for onlot system inspection.
PSMA/NOF trains and certifies its members to perform onlot wastewater treatment system inspections using the PSMA/NOF Standards. The Standards embody a protocol which, when fully applied, evaluates every component of an onlot wastewater treatment system for proper function.
Upon completion of an inspection, the inspector will provide a written report with pertinent details and conclusions. The report conclusions are comprised of “Satisfactory”, “Satisfactory with concerns”, “More Investigation needed”, and “Unsatisfactory”. Individual opinions may also be reflected in an inspection report, however, the PSMA/NOF Standards of Practice does not acknowledge such opinions as they are only subjective and a business decision of the company or issuer.
PSMA expects all members to conduct their businesses in a manner that avoids any actual conflict of interest or the appearance of a conflict. Inspection reports indicating that repairs are necessary may provide a proposal separate from the report, but shall include the following statement:
“You may select any service provider; however, work not performed by this company must be inspected by a PSMA/NOF certified inspector in order to verify satisfactory repairs and issue an updated inspection report”.
Please keep in mind, that there is a difference between a PSMA/NOF inspection and a Regulatory inspection. You may read about the differences at this link “PSMA Inspections vs. Regulatory Inspections“.
PSMA has instituted a Complaint policy to assist any dissatisfaction by an individual who feels that a current PSMA/NOF certified inspector or company behaved in an unethical manner or performed an improper inspection.
PSMA does not acknowledge the use of the PSMA/NOF Standards of Practice by non-member companies or non-certified inspectors.
Prior to filing a complaint, you should confirm the following: (1) Is the inspection company a current PSMA member? and (2) Is the inspector a PSMA certified inspector; Is their certification current?
Once you have confirmed the inspector’s credentials, you must read the “Complaint Procedures” document and then fill out the “Complaint Form” properly for your complaint to be reviewed. You may obtain both of these documents via the links at the bottom of this webpage.
The PSMA Board of Directors has adopted a procedure to implement when allegations are received about a PSMA Certified inspector’s performance or conclusions.
When a complaint is received, the President appoints a three member Ethics Committee. Committee members are selected from the PSMA Board of Directors. The selection process assures that committee members are not working in the market place/geographic area where the complaint is located.
Complaint Procedure:
Complaints concerning any PSMA certified inspector will be forwarded to the Ethics Committee for evaluation. Such complaints will be treated as confidential, and no information regarding same will be provided to any person except to the extent necessary to implement this procedure.
- The Ethics Committee will forward to the Complainant a copy of the PSMA Complaint form, requiring the form to be completed and signed by the Complainant before any further action on the Complaint is taken.
- Files dealing with Complaints will be segregated from other PSMA files, and secured in such way that access is limited to the Ethics Committee members, or those acting pursuant to their direction.
- A copy of the completed Complaint form will be provided to the person who is the subject of the Complaint, and that person will be invited to file a response to the Complaint’s allegations.
- After receiving the Complaint and the response, if any, the Ethics Committee will determine whether further investigation is warranted. Such further investigation could involve interviews with the persons involved, a site visit, or obtaining and reviewing additional documents.
- After completion of the investigation, the Ethics Committee will prepare its findings. A copy of the findings shall be sent to the inspector involved who will be given an opportunity to respond to the findings. Upon receipt of the response or thirty days following receipt of the findings by the inspector, the Ethics Committee shall consider the response, if any,, to the findings and adopt a final set of findings and a recommended course of action which shall be submitted to the Board of Directors.
- The Board, in closed session, will review and consider the findings and recommendations of the Ethics Committee and will take whatever action it deems appropriate. This action could involve a suspension or revocation of the inspector’s certification, or it could involve other remedial actions.
- Throughout the deliberations of the Ethics Committee and the Board, it will be presumed that the PSMA inspector involved acted appropriately unless reliable and convincing evidence to the contrary has been developed.
- The Board will communicate its findings and any action it decides to take to the inspector involved. If the Board elects to publish a summary of the action for the benefit of its members, the identity of the persons involved will not be disclosed in any such summary.
- Board Members, Staff, Ethics Committee Members, and all those who have access to information involving the Complaint will keep the identity of the parties involved confidential and not reveal any information concerning the proceedings to any other person unless required by law to do so.
DOWNLOAD COPY OF COMPLAINT PROCEDURES | DOWNLOAD COPY OF COMPLAINT FORM